It’s always funny to me how its not the things that I say, but the things that I don’t say that get attributed to me.  In a recent project that got nicknamed “Man vs. CNC” by the YouTube commenters, I did a project that was supposed to show the difference between making something with handheld power tools vs making the same exact product on the CNC machine.  I spent some time and looked for a project that I though would be difficult enough that it would be a fair comparison, but also not something so hard that required a bunch of specialized tools.  That led me down the path of doing a router based project, that resulted in the need for pockets in the wood.  And that landed me on a party serving tray with seven pockets.

Geek Tip: Download the Party Serving Tray SketchUP and SVG files if you want to try this experiment yourself and share your results.

CNC Fail: The Setup

Make a Wooden Party Serving Tray 0004 The original idea for the video was going to be that I was going to make the party serving tray twice, once on the CNC and once by hand.  That was of course before my big CNC Fail.  More on that in a minute.  So I set out to make two identical blanks to start from.  CNC or no CNC, this part had to be done by hand.  I grabbed a section of Walnut and a section of Maple I had laying around.  Jointed and planed them, and then glued them up.  This glue up was roughly 25″ by 13″.  Once that dried I cut it in half to make my two identical blanks.

CNC Fail : The Contest

Make a Wooden Party Serving Tray 0019 The Man vs CNC contest was to go down like this.  I would start and stop a stopwatch as the process went along.  I would time each event to see how long it took, including the setup time of the CNC, as compared to the setup time of my hand version.  This would include the time it took me to design the CNC version in Illustrator vs the time it took me to make the MDF template on the scroll saw.

Following that, I would then judge the quality of the completed product, comparing the differences and craftsmanship of each one.  I would then declare a winner, or a tie depending on the points scored and time taken to achieve the results.

CNC Fail: The Expected Results

This is one of those situations where the results I expected and what actually happened are almost opposite.  What I expected was the CNC to take much longer than my hand version.  I had already done the calculations on the G-Code and knew I was looking at 7 hours for the CNC to finish.  However, I also expected the quality of the CNC work to be much better.  Straighter lines, less waviness to the pattern, etc.  I had already planned out that the winner would most likely be hand, but only by a very slim margin because the CNC would take much much longer to complete, negating much of the benefits.

CNC Fail: The Final Results

CNC fail Well, if you’ve seen the video, you know what happened.  The CNC didn’t work out so well and the handmade version turned out beautiful.

The First Fail

The first fail was in the homing sequence.  Even after checking everything I still cannot figure out what went wrong with this one. Somehow the entire design got pushed up about 3/4 of an inch.  This meant the top portion of the party serving tray ran out of material.  I knew I could save this, because I could simply laminate another section of maple to the tray and finish the outside cut, so at this point I decided to allow the tray to complete and correct this when we got to the outer tool path.

The Second Fail

After over 7 hours of milling, and while just begging to cut the center dish out the belt on the X-Carve slipped. This moved the center dish to one side by about 1/8 inch or so.  From a design perspective this was not a recoverable event.  However, we were so close to being finished I decided to let it go.  It would just become part of my score.

The Third and Final Fail

During some of the last few passes of the center dish the DeWalt DWP611 started to smoke. I was across the room, but could smell the burn smell.  I ran across the room to arrive just in time to watch as the bit fell out of the collet and drilled a hole all the way through the party serving platter, the bed of the X-Carve and the started to attack my work bench top.  There was no recovering from this.  The X-Cave had failed miserably and had lost the competition.  Man had won.

I am not Anti-CNC

Lots of you assumed after this competition that I was now anti-CNC.  Or at least anti-X-Carve.  This is not the case.  I still use my X-Carve regularly and I still plan to use the CNC often.  I just plan to use the right tool for the job and these hobby class CNC machines are not up the bigger jobs.  Also, the CNC is fantastic for making templates.  Had I not been doing a Man vs CNC competition, I would have made the template for the serving tray on the CNC, rather than the scroll saw.  It would have been more accurate than the scroll saw version and is the perfect type of CNC operation.

Some Additional Considerations

24VDC vs DeWalt DWP611

24VDC vs DeWalt DWP611

I want to always be as fair and honest as I can be.  In the interest of that fairness I want to point out that I ran the machine at a higher than the recommended depth-per-pass than that Easel recommends.  I did this because originally the estimate was 13 hours of carving time.  I didn’t have 13 hours to burn.  Also, I had replaced the default 24 Volt Spindle with the DeWalt DWP611 router.  In addition I bought a very high quality 2 flute bit.  I thought with that combination I would be able to exceed the recommendations pretty easily.  I did several test cuts in some scrap maple (the harder of the two woods) and both cuts were perfect.  I can’t know if this feed rate was what led to some of the problems.  But I will say this with certain authority: Running the X-Carve for 7 hours has to be less stress on the spindle than 13.  Lowering the depth-per-pass might have prevented the belt from slipping, but I seriously doubt the DeWalt would have survived for 13 hours of continuous use.

So with that, Happy CNCing!