<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 37 States now Investigating Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thegeekpub.com/1098/37-states-now-investigating-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thegeekpub.com/1098/37-states-now-investigating-google/</link>
	<description>Drink Beer and Geek Out</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 15:52:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlphaGeek</title>
		<link>http://www.thegeekpub.com/1098/37-states-now-investigating-google/comment-page-1/#comment-1439</link>
		<dc:creator>AlphaGeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thegeekpub.com/?p=1098#comment-1439</guid>
		<description>Actually, the MAC address are not a big deal at all in this.  Anyone with an old wifi/bluetooth enabled Palm could walk down the sidewalk in front of your house and get that info.  The issue is more around the data packets being sent, although, with people broadcasting them from their house like miniature TV stations, receiving these packets is not suck a big deal either.  The problem was that the program that Google was using, which was intended to capture wifi identifying info for the purpose of mapping out where public access wifi hot spots were, stored the data packets being sent from home wifi networks.  These packets are, of course, meaningless unless a) unencrypted (everyone uses encryption on their networks, right?) and b) assembled correctly (&quot;put into context&quot; you might say).

Should we trust Google?  Not after your scare tactics, but, if you actually understood the technology, there is no reason not to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the MAC address are not a big deal at all in this.  Anyone with an old wifi/bluetooth enabled Palm could walk down the sidewalk in front of your house and get that info.  The issue is more around the data packets being sent, although, with people broadcasting them from their house like miniature TV stations, receiving these packets is not suck a big deal either.  The problem was that the program that Google was using, which was intended to capture wifi identifying info for the purpose of mapping out where public access wifi hot spots were, stored the data packets being sent from home wifi networks.  These packets are, of course, meaningless unless a) unencrypted (everyone uses encryption on their networks, right?) and b) assembled correctly (&#8220;put into context&#8221; you might say).</p>
<p>Should we trust Google?  Not after your scare tactics, but, if you actually understood the technology, there is no reason not to.</p>
<p>Rate this comment: <img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="up-1439" src="http://www.thegeekpub.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/3_16_up.png" alt="Thumb up" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('1439', 'add', 'www.thegeekpub.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '3_16_');" title="" /> <span id="karma-1439-up" style="font-size:12px; color:#009933;">0</span>&nbsp;<img style="padding: 0px; border: none; cursor: pointer;" onmouseover="this.width=this.width*1.3" onmouseout="this.width=this.width/1.2" id="down-1439" src="http://www.thegeekpub.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/images/3_16_down.png" alt="Thumb down" onclick="javascript:ckratingKarma('1439', 'subtract', 'www.thegeekpub.com/wp-content/plugins/comment-rating/', '3_16_')" title="" /> <span id="karma-1439-down" style="font-size:12px; color:#990033;">0</span></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

